Organic Acids as Potential Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters for Pigs
By Zdzislaw Mroz, Wageningen University and presented at the 2005 Banff Pork Seminar - In the context of phasing-out antibiotics for growth promotion and prophylactics against enteric diseases in pigs within the EU, a particular interest is now paid to the antimicrobial potency of various carboxylic acids, and of short chain fatty acids (SCFA), in particular.Summary
Their addition generally lowers the pH and buffering capacity of the diet, increases gastrointestinal acidity, proteolysis and nutrient digestibility, promotes beneficial bacteria at the expense of pathogens and modulates numerous physiological processes after absorption. Four major benefits can be expected:
- improved health and resistance to disease;
- faster growth;
- increased efficiency of diet utilisation;
- better carcass quality.
Also, secondary effects may be achieved with supplemental SCFA, i.e., less volatilised ammonia (“acidic rains”) and pollutants (N and P). This paper outlines some physicochemical features and mode of action of SCFA and their salts, which are commonly available for pig producers. Also, some nutritional, bacteriological and physiological responses to graded doses and sources of SCFA during post-weaning, growing-finishing and reproductive cycles of pigs are examined.
Introduction
Prevention of disease transmission and enhancement of growth and feed
efficiency are critical factors in modern pig production. For more than 50 years
enteric disease suppression and growth promotion have been effectively
achieved by the inclusion of various antibiotics or chemotherapeutics at subtherapeutic
doses into diets. The estimated economic benefits in terms of
improved growth rates ranged from 3.3 to 8.8% and feed efficiency from 2.5 to
7.0% (Viaene and Verbeke, 1999).
However, in recent years more scientific
evidence was gathered on a relationship between the feed medication and
pathogenic resistance in human therapy (Aarestrup, 2000). In consequence, all
in-feed antibiotics and chemotherapeutics will be banned in the EU by 2006. In
this context, a particular scientific interest is now paid to the antimicrobial
potency of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and their salts when applied
individually or as a mix.
This paper outlines some essentials on the
physicochemical properties and mode of action of supplemental SCFA and
their salts, which in conjunction with endogenous SCFA from particular sections
of the gut, can be addressed for suppressing pathogenic growth/colonization
and improving digestion, absorption, mucosal immunity, and trophic effects on
intestinal brush border (villi and crypts). Besides, the effects of graded doses
and sources of SCFA during post-weaning, growing-finishing and reproductive
cycles of pigs on performance are presented.
Physicochemical Properties and Mode of Action of SCFA
Natural feed resources (fresh, pre-fermented or ensiled ingredients of plant or
animal origin and additives) contain more than 100 carboxylic acids and/or
derivatives. Among supplemental SCFA and their salts for pigs, a particular
practical interest is focused on those listed in Table 1.
Among other acidifiers officially approved in the EU are the following: Nasorbate,
Ca-sorbate, K-sorbate, tartaric acid, Na-tartarate, K-tartarate, NaKtartarate,
NH3-formate, Na-formate, NH3 -propionate, Na-propionate, K-acetate,
Ca-acetate, Na-diacetate, Na-citrate, K-citrate, K-lactate, benzoic acid and Nabenzoate.
These acidifiers can be administered individually or as a mix (to
broaden a spectrum of antimicrobial potency) via feeds or drinking water.
The
solid acidifiers are easier to handle, whereas the liquid forms may be volatile
(up to 20%) during spraying, and their disadvantage could be the corrosiveness
and unpleasant odour). This disadvantage can be eliminated by a coating
technology for the encapsulation and sustained controlled release taste
masking. Moreover, this technology allows also controlling their site of action,
as well as the velocity of release and dissociation (Von Felde and Rudat, 1998;
Gauthier, 2002).
Further Information
To continue reading this article, including graphs click here
To view the full Banff Pork Listing, click here
Source: Paper presented during the 2005 Banff Pork Seminar Procedings